<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="vertan-hahn-2003-specification">
    <titleInfo>
        <title>Specification and evaluation of machine translation toy systems - criteria for laboratory assignments</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Cristina</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Vertan</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Walther</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">von Hahn</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <originInfo>
        <dateIssued>2003-sep 23-27</dateIssued>
    </originInfo>
    <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
    <relatedItem type="host">
        <titleInfo>
            <title>Workshop on Teaching Translation Technologies and Tools</title>
        </titleInfo>
        <originInfo>
            <place>
                <placeTerm type="text">New Orleans, USA</placeTerm>
            </place>
        </originInfo>
        <genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
    </relatedItem>
    <abstract>Implementation of machine translation “toy” systems is a good practical exercise especially for computer science students. Our aim in a series of courses on MT in 2002 was to make students familiar both with typical problems of Machine Translation in particular and natural language processing in general, as well as with software implementation. In order to simulate a software implementation proc- ess as realistic as possible, we introduced more than 20 evaluation criteria to be filled by the students when they evaluated their own products. The criteria go far beyond such “toy” systems, but they should demonstrate the students, what a real software evaluation means, and which are the particularities of Machine Translation Evaluation.</abstract>
    <identifier type="citekey">vertan-hahn-2003-specification</identifier>
    <location>
        <url>https://aclanthology.org/2003.mtsummit-tttt.7</url>
    </location>
    <part>
        <date>2003-sep 23-27</date>
    </part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>

%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Specification and evaluation of machine translation toy systems - criteria for laboratory assignments
%A Vertan, Cristina
%A von Hahn, Walther
%S Workshop on Teaching Translation Technologies and Tools
%D 2003
%8 sep 23 27
%C New Orleans, USA
%F vertan-hahn-2003-specification
%X Implementation of machine translation “toy” systems is a good practical exercise especially for computer science students. Our aim in a series of courses on MT in 2002 was to make students familiar both with typical problems of Machine Translation in particular and natural language processing in general, as well as with software implementation. In order to simulate a software implementation proc- ess as realistic as possible, we introduced more than 20 evaluation criteria to be filled by the students when they evaluated their own products. The criteria go far beyond such “toy” systems, but they should demonstrate the students, what a real software evaluation means, and which are the particularities of Machine Translation Evaluation.
%U https://aclanthology.org/2003.mtsummit-tttt.7

Markdown (Informal)

[Specification and evaluation of machine translation toy systems - criteria for laboratory assignments](https://aclanthology.org/2003.mtsummit-tttt.7) (Vertan & von Hahn, MTSummit 2003)

• Specification and evaluation of machine translation toy systems - criteria for laboratory assignments (Vertan & von Hahn, MTSummit 2003)

ACL

• Cristina Vertan and Walther von Hahn. 2003. Specification and evaluation of machine translation toy systems - criteria for laboratory assignments. In Workshop on Teaching Translation Technologies and Tools, New Orleans, USA.