@inproceedings{hao-2020-evaluating,
title = "Evaluating Attribution Methods using White-Box {LSTM}s",
author = "Hao, Yiding",
editor = "Alishahi, Afra and
Belinkov, Yonatan and
Chrupa{\l}a, Grzegorz and
Hupkes, Dieuwke and
Pinter, Yuval and
Sajjad, Hassan",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Third BlackboxNLP Workshop on Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP",
month = nov,
year = "2020",
address = "Online",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2020.blackboxnlp-1.28/",
doi = "10.18653/v1/2020.blackboxnlp-1.28",
pages = "300--313",
abstract = "Interpretability methods for neural networks are difficult to evaluate because we do not understand the black-box models typically used to test them. This paper proposes a framework in which interpretability methods are evaluated using manually constructed networks, which we call white-box networks, whose behavior is understood a priori. We evaluate five methods for producing attribution heatmaps by applying them to white-box LSTM classifiers for tasks based on formal languages. Although our white-box classifiers solve their tasks perfectly and transparently, we find that all five attribution methods fail to produce the expected model explanations."
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="hao-2020-evaluating">
<titleInfo>
<title>Evaluating Attribution Methods using White-Box LSTMs</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Yiding</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Hao</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2020-11</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the Third BlackboxNLP Workshop on Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Afra</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Alishahi</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Yonatan</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Belinkov</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Grzegorz</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Chrupała</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Dieuwke</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Hupkes</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Yuval</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Pinter</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Hassan</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Sajjad</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Online</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>Interpretability methods for neural networks are difficult to evaluate because we do not understand the black-box models typically used to test them. This paper proposes a framework in which interpretability methods are evaluated using manually constructed networks, which we call white-box networks, whose behavior is understood a priori. We evaluate five methods for producing attribution heatmaps by applying them to white-box LSTM classifiers for tasks based on formal languages. Although our white-box classifiers solve their tasks perfectly and transparently, we find that all five attribution methods fail to produce the expected model explanations.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">hao-2020-evaluating</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.18653/v1/2020.blackboxnlp-1.28</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2020.blackboxnlp-1.28/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2020-11</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>300</start>
<end>313</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Evaluating Attribution Methods using White-Box LSTMs
%A Hao, Yiding
%Y Alishahi, Afra
%Y Belinkov, Yonatan
%Y Chrupała, Grzegorz
%Y Hupkes, Dieuwke
%Y Pinter, Yuval
%Y Sajjad, Hassan
%S Proceedings of the Third BlackboxNLP Workshop on Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP
%D 2020
%8 November
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Online
%F hao-2020-evaluating
%X Interpretability methods for neural networks are difficult to evaluate because we do not understand the black-box models typically used to test them. This paper proposes a framework in which interpretability methods are evaluated using manually constructed networks, which we call white-box networks, whose behavior is understood a priori. We evaluate five methods for producing attribution heatmaps by applying them to white-box LSTM classifiers for tasks based on formal languages. Although our white-box classifiers solve their tasks perfectly and transparently, we find that all five attribution methods fail to produce the expected model explanations.
%R 10.18653/v1/2020.blackboxnlp-1.28
%U https://aclanthology.org/2020.blackboxnlp-1.28/
%U https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.blackboxnlp-1.28
%P 300-313
Markdown (Informal)
[Evaluating Attribution Methods using White-Box LSTMs](https://aclanthology.org/2020.blackboxnlp-1.28/) (Hao, BlackboxNLP 2020)
ACL