<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="gao-etal-2024-evaluating">
    <titleInfo>
        <title>Evaluating Unsupervised Argument Aligners via Generation of Conclusions of Structured Scientific Abstracts</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Yingqiang</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Gao</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Nianlong</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Gu</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Jessica</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Lam</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">James</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Henderson</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Richard</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Hahnloser</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <originInfo>
        <dateIssued>2024-03</dateIssued>
    </originInfo>
    <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
    <relatedItem type="host">
        <titleInfo>
            <title>Proceedings of the 18th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers)</title>
        </titleInfo>
        <name type="personal">
            <namePart type="given">Yvette</namePart>
            <namePart type="family">Graham</namePart>
            <role>
                <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
            </role>
        </name>
        <name type="personal">
            <namePart type="given">Matthew</namePart>
            <namePart type="family">Purver</namePart>
            <role>
                <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
            </role>
        </name>
        <originInfo>
            <publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
            <place>
                <placeTerm type="text">St. Julian’s, Malta</placeTerm>
            </place>
        </originInfo>
        <genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
    </relatedItem>
    <abstract>Scientific abstracts provide a concise summary of research findings, making them a valuable resource for extracting scientific arguments. In this study, we assess various unsupervised approaches for extracting arguments as aligned premise-conclusion pairs: semantic similarity, text perplexity, and mutual information. We aggregate structured abstracts from PubMed Central Open Access papers published in 2022 and evaluate the argument aligners in terms of the performance of language models that we fine-tune to generate the conclusions from the extracted premise given as input prompts. We find that mutual information outperforms the other measures on this task, suggesting that the reasoning process in scientific abstracts hinges mostly on linguistic constructs beyond simple textual similarity.</abstract>
    <identifier type="citekey">gao-etal-2024-evaluating</identifier>
    <location>
        <url>https://aclanthology.org/2024.eacl-short.14</url>
    </location>
    <part>
        <date>2024-03</date>
        <extent unit="page">
            <start>151</start>
            <end>160</end>
        </extent>
    </part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>

%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Evaluating Unsupervised Argument Aligners via Generation of Conclusions of Structured Scientific Abstracts
%A Gao, Yingqiang
%A Gu, Nianlong
%A Lam, Jessica
%A Henderson, James
%A Hahnloser, Richard
%Y Graham, Yvette
%Y Purver, Matthew
%S Proceedings of the 18th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers)
%D 2024
%8 March
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C St. Julian’s, Malta
%F gao-etal-2024-evaluating
%X Scientific abstracts provide a concise summary of research findings, making them a valuable resource for extracting scientific arguments. In this study, we assess various unsupervised approaches for extracting arguments as aligned premise-conclusion pairs: semantic similarity, text perplexity, and mutual information. We aggregate structured abstracts from PubMed Central Open Access papers published in 2022 and evaluate the argument aligners in terms of the performance of language models that we fine-tune to generate the conclusions from the extracted premise given as input prompts. We find that mutual information outperforms the other measures on this task, suggesting that the reasoning process in scientific abstracts hinges mostly on linguistic constructs beyond simple textual similarity.
%U https://aclanthology.org/2024.eacl-short.14
%P 151-160

Markdown (Informal)

[Evaluating Unsupervised Argument Aligners via Generation of Conclusions of Structured Scientific Abstracts](https://aclanthology.org/2024.eacl-short.14) (Gao et al., EACL 2024)

• Evaluating Unsupervised Argument Aligners via Generation of Conclusions of Structured Scientific Abstracts (Gao et al., EACL 2024)

ACL

• Yingqiang Gao, Nianlong Gu, Jessica Lam, James Henderson, and Richard Hahnloser. 2024. Evaluating Unsupervised Argument Aligners via Generation of Conclusions of Structured Scientific Abstracts. In Proceedings of the 18th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers), pages 151–160, St. Julian’s, Malta. Association for Computational Linguistics.