@inproceedings{zhu-rzeszotarski-2024-get,
title = "{\textquotedblleft}Get Their Hands Dirty, Not Mine{\textquotedblright}: On Researcher-Annotator Collaboration and the Agency of Annotators",
author = "Zhu, Shengqi and
Rzeszotarski, Jeffrey",
editor = "Ku, Lun-Wei and
Martins, Andre and
Srikumar, Vivek",
booktitle = "Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024",
month = aug,
year = "2024",
address = "Bangkok, Thailand",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2024.findings-acl.518/",
doi = "10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.518",
pages = "8773--8782",
abstract = "Annotation quality is often framed as post-hoc cleanup of annotator-caused issues. This position paper discusses whether, how, and why this narrative limits the scope of improving annotation. We call to consider annotation as a procedural collaboration, outlining three points in this direction:(1) An issue can be either annotator- or researcher-oriented, where one party is accountable and the other party may lack ability to fix it; (2) yet, they can co-occur or have similar consequences, and thus any specific problem we encounter may be a combination;(3) therefore, we need a new language to capture the nuance and holistically describe the full procedure to resolve these issues.To that end, we propose to study how agency is manifested in annotation and picture how this perspective benefits the community more broadly."
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="zhu-rzeszotarski-2024-get">
<titleInfo>
<title>“Get Their Hands Dirty, Not Mine”: On Researcher-Annotator Collaboration and the Agency of Annotators</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Shengqi</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Zhu</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Jeffrey</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Rzeszotarski</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2024-08</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Lun-Wei</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Ku</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Andre</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Martins</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Vivek</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Srikumar</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Bangkok, Thailand</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>Annotation quality is often framed as post-hoc cleanup of annotator-caused issues. This position paper discusses whether, how, and why this narrative limits the scope of improving annotation. We call to consider annotation as a procedural collaboration, outlining three points in this direction:(1) An issue can be either annotator- or researcher-oriented, where one party is accountable and the other party may lack ability to fix it; (2) yet, they can co-occur or have similar consequences, and thus any specific problem we encounter may be a combination;(3) therefore, we need a new language to capture the nuance and holistically describe the full procedure to resolve these issues.To that end, we propose to study how agency is manifested in annotation and picture how this perspective benefits the community more broadly.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">zhu-rzeszotarski-2024-get</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.518</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2024.findings-acl.518/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2024-08</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>8773</start>
<end>8782</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T “Get Their Hands Dirty, Not Mine”: On Researcher-Annotator Collaboration and the Agency of Annotators
%A Zhu, Shengqi
%A Rzeszotarski, Jeffrey
%Y Ku, Lun-Wei
%Y Martins, Andre
%Y Srikumar, Vivek
%S Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024
%D 2024
%8 August
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Bangkok, Thailand
%F zhu-rzeszotarski-2024-get
%X Annotation quality is often framed as post-hoc cleanup of annotator-caused issues. This position paper discusses whether, how, and why this narrative limits the scope of improving annotation. We call to consider annotation as a procedural collaboration, outlining three points in this direction:(1) An issue can be either annotator- or researcher-oriented, where one party is accountable and the other party may lack ability to fix it; (2) yet, they can co-occur or have similar consequences, and thus any specific problem we encounter may be a combination;(3) therefore, we need a new language to capture the nuance and holistically describe the full procedure to resolve these issues.To that end, we propose to study how agency is manifested in annotation and picture how this perspective benefits the community more broadly.
%R 10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.518
%U https://aclanthology.org/2024.findings-acl.518/
%U https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.518
%P 8773-8782
Markdown (Informal)
[“Get Their Hands Dirty, Not Mine”: On Researcher-Annotator Collaboration and the Agency of Annotators](https://aclanthology.org/2024.findings-acl.518/) (Zhu & Rzeszotarski, Findings 2024)
ACL