@inproceedings{vijay-hershcovich-2024-abstract,
title = "Can {A}bstract {M}eaning {R}epresentation Facilitate Fair Legal Judgement Predictions?",
author = "Vijay, Supriti and
Hershcovich, Daniel",
editor = "Tafreshi, Shabnam and
Akula, Arjun and
Sedoc, Jo{\~a}o and
Drozd, Aleksandr and
Rogers, Anna and
Rumshisky, Anna",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Insights from Negative Results in NLP",
month = jun,
year = "2024",
address = "Mexico City, Mexico",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2024.insights-1.13/",
doi = "10.18653/v1/2024.insights-1.13",
pages = "101--109",
abstract = "Legal judgment prediction encompasses the automated prediction of case outcomes by leveraging historical facts and opinions. While this approach holds the potential to enhance the efficiency of the legal system, it also raises critical concerns regarding the perpetuation of biases. Abstract Meaning Representation has shown promise as an intermediate text representation in various downstream NLP tasks due to its ability to capture semantically meaningful information in a graph-like structure. In this paper, we employ this ability of AMR in the legal judgement prediction task and assess to what extent it encodes biases, or conversely, abstracts away from them. Our study reveals that while AMR-based models exhibit worse overall performance than transformer-based models, they are less biased for attributes like age and defendant state compared to gender. By shedding light on these findings, this paper contributes to a more nuanced understanding of AMR`s potential benefits and limitations in legal NLP."
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="vijay-hershcovich-2024-abstract">
<titleInfo>
<title>Can Abstract Meaning Representation Facilitate Fair Legal Judgement Predictions?</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Supriti</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Vijay</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Daniel</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Hershcovich</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2024-06</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Insights from Negative Results in NLP</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Shabnam</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Tafreshi</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Arjun</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Akula</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">João</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Sedoc</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Aleksandr</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Drozd</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Anna</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Rogers</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Anna</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Rumshisky</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Mexico City, Mexico</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>Legal judgment prediction encompasses the automated prediction of case outcomes by leveraging historical facts and opinions. While this approach holds the potential to enhance the efficiency of the legal system, it also raises critical concerns regarding the perpetuation of biases. Abstract Meaning Representation has shown promise as an intermediate text representation in various downstream NLP tasks due to its ability to capture semantically meaningful information in a graph-like structure. In this paper, we employ this ability of AMR in the legal judgement prediction task and assess to what extent it encodes biases, or conversely, abstracts away from them. Our study reveals that while AMR-based models exhibit worse overall performance than transformer-based models, they are less biased for attributes like age and defendant state compared to gender. By shedding light on these findings, this paper contributes to a more nuanced understanding of AMR‘s potential benefits and limitations in legal NLP.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">vijay-hershcovich-2024-abstract</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.18653/v1/2024.insights-1.13</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2024.insights-1.13/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2024-06</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>101</start>
<end>109</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Can Abstract Meaning Representation Facilitate Fair Legal Judgement Predictions?
%A Vijay, Supriti
%A Hershcovich, Daniel
%Y Tafreshi, Shabnam
%Y Akula, Arjun
%Y Sedoc, João
%Y Drozd, Aleksandr
%Y Rogers, Anna
%Y Rumshisky, Anna
%S Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Insights from Negative Results in NLP
%D 2024
%8 June
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Mexico City, Mexico
%F vijay-hershcovich-2024-abstract
%X Legal judgment prediction encompasses the automated prediction of case outcomes by leveraging historical facts and opinions. While this approach holds the potential to enhance the efficiency of the legal system, it also raises critical concerns regarding the perpetuation of biases. Abstract Meaning Representation has shown promise as an intermediate text representation in various downstream NLP tasks due to its ability to capture semantically meaningful information in a graph-like structure. In this paper, we employ this ability of AMR in the legal judgement prediction task and assess to what extent it encodes biases, or conversely, abstracts away from them. Our study reveals that while AMR-based models exhibit worse overall performance than transformer-based models, they are less biased for attributes like age and defendant state compared to gender. By shedding light on these findings, this paper contributes to a more nuanced understanding of AMR‘s potential benefits and limitations in legal NLP.
%R 10.18653/v1/2024.insights-1.13
%U https://aclanthology.org/2024.insights-1.13/
%U https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.insights-1.13
%P 101-109
Markdown (Informal)
[Can Abstract Meaning Representation Facilitate Fair Legal Judgement Predictions?](https://aclanthology.org/2024.insights-1.13/) (Vijay & Hershcovich, insights 2024)
ACL