@inproceedings{van-der-lee-etal-2019-best,
title = "Best practices for the human evaluation of automatically generated text",
author = "van der Lee, Chris and
Gatt, Albert and
van Miltenburg, Emiel and
Wubben, Sander and
Krahmer, Emiel",
editor = "van Deemter, Kees and
Lin, Chenghua and
Takamura, Hiroya",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Natural Language Generation",
month = oct # "{--}" # nov,
year = "2019",
address = "Tokyo, Japan",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/W19-8643",
doi = "10.18653/v1/W19-8643",
pages = "355--368",
abstract = "Currently, there is little agreement as to how Natural Language Generation (NLG) systems should be evaluated. While there is some agreement regarding automatic metrics, there is a high degree of variation in the way that human evaluation is carried out. This paper provides an overview of how human evaluation is currently conducted, and presents a set of best practices, grounded in the literature. With this paper, we hope to contribute to the quality and consistency of human evaluations in NLG.",
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="van-der-lee-etal-2019-best">
<titleInfo>
<title>Best practices for the human evaluation of automatically generated text</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Chris</namePart>
<namePart type="family">van der Lee</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Albert</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Gatt</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Emiel</namePart>
<namePart type="family">van Miltenburg</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Sander</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Wubben</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Emiel</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Krahmer</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2019-oct–nov</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Natural Language Generation</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Kees</namePart>
<namePart type="family">van Deemter</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Chenghua</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Lin</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Hiroya</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Takamura</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Tokyo, Japan</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>Currently, there is little agreement as to how Natural Language Generation (NLG) systems should be evaluated. While there is some agreement regarding automatic metrics, there is a high degree of variation in the way that human evaluation is carried out. This paper provides an overview of how human evaluation is currently conducted, and presents a set of best practices, grounded in the literature. With this paper, we hope to contribute to the quality and consistency of human evaluations in NLG.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">van-der-lee-etal-2019-best</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.18653/v1/W19-8643</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/W19-8643</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2019-oct–nov</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>355</start>
<end>368</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Best practices for the human evaluation of automatically generated text
%A van der Lee, Chris
%A Gatt, Albert
%A van Miltenburg, Emiel
%A Wubben, Sander
%A Krahmer, Emiel
%Y van Deemter, Kees
%Y Lin, Chenghua
%Y Takamura, Hiroya
%S Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Natural Language Generation
%D 2019
%8 oct–nov
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Tokyo, Japan
%F van-der-lee-etal-2019-best
%X Currently, there is little agreement as to how Natural Language Generation (NLG) systems should be evaluated. While there is some agreement regarding automatic metrics, there is a high degree of variation in the way that human evaluation is carried out. This paper provides an overview of how human evaluation is currently conducted, and presents a set of best practices, grounded in the literature. With this paper, we hope to contribute to the quality and consistency of human evaluations in NLG.
%R 10.18653/v1/W19-8643
%U https://aclanthology.org/W19-8643
%U https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W19-8643
%P 355-368
Markdown (Informal)
[Best practices for the human evaluation of automatically generated text](https://aclanthology.org/W19-8643) (van der Lee et al., INLG 2019)
ACL