Michael Hassid


2023

pdf bib
Finding the SWEET Spot: Analysis and Improvement of Adaptive Inference in Low Resource Settings
Daniel Rotem | Michael Hassid | Jonathan Mamou | Roy Schwartz
Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)

Adaptive inference is a simple method for reducing inference costs. The method works by maintaining multiple classifiers of different capacities, and allocating resources to each test instance according to its difficulty. In this work, we compare the two main approaches for adaptive inference, Early-Exit and Multi-Model, when training data is limited. First, we observe that for models with the same architecture and size, individual Multi-Model classifiers outperform their Early-Exit counterparts by an average of 2.3%. We show that this gap is caused by Early-Exit classifiers sharing model parameters during training, resulting in conflicting gradient updates of model weights. We find that despite this gap, Early-Exit still provides a better speed-accuracy trade-off due to the overhead of the Multi-Model approach. To address these issues, we propose SWEET (Separating Weights for Early-Exit Transformers) an Early-Exit fine-tuning method that assigns each classifier its own set of unique model weights, not updated by other classifiers. We compare SWEET’s speed-accuracy curve to standard Early-Exit and Multi-Model baselines and find that it outperforms both methods at fast speeds while maintaining comparable scores to Early- Exit at slow speeds. Moreover, SWEET individual classifiers outperform Early-Exit ones by 1.1% on average. SWEET enjoys the benefits of both methods, paving the way for further reduction of inference costs in NLP.

pdf bib
Efficient Methods for Natural Language Processing: A Survey
Marcos Treviso | Ji-Ung Lee | Tianchu Ji | Betty van Aken | Qingqing Cao | Manuel R. Ciosici | Michael Hassid | Kenneth Heafield | Sara Hooker | Colin Raffel | Pedro H. Martins | André F. T. Martins | Jessica Zosa Forde | Peter Milder | Edwin Simpson | Noam Slonim | Jesse Dodge | Emma Strubell | Niranjan Balasubramanian | Leon Derczynski | Iryna Gurevych | Roy Schwartz
Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Volume 11

Recent work in natural language processing (NLP) has yielded appealing results from scaling model parameters and training data; however, using only scale to improve performance means that resource consumption also grows. Such resources include data, time, storage, or energy, all of which are naturally limited and unevenly distributed. This motivates research into efficient methods that require fewer resources to achieve similar results. This survey synthesizes and relates current methods and findings in efficient NLP. We aim to provide both guidance for conducting NLP under limited resources, and point towards promising research directions for developing more efficient methods.

2022

pdf bib
How Much Does Attention Actually Attend? Questioning the Importance of Attention in Pretrained Transformers
Michael Hassid | Hao Peng | Daniel Rotem | Jungo Kasai | Ivan Montero | Noah A. Smith | Roy Schwartz
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2022

The attention mechanism is considered the backbone of the widely-used Transformer architecture. It contextualizes the input by computing input-specific attention matrices. We find that this mechanism, while powerful and elegant, is not as important as typically thought for pretrained language models. We introduce PAPA, a new probing method that replaces the input-dependent attention matrices with constant ones—the average attention weights over multiple inputs. We use PAPA to analyze several established pretrained Transformers on six downstream tasks. We find that without any input-dependent attention, all models achieve competitive performance—an average relative drop of only 8% from the probing baseline. Further, little or no performance drop is observed when replacing half of the input-dependent attention matrices with constant (input-independent) ones. Interestingly, we show that better-performing models lose more from applying our method than weaker models, suggesting that the utilization of the input-dependent attention mechanism might be a factor in their success. Our results motivate research on simpler alternatives to input-dependent attention, as well as on methods for better utilization of this mechanism in the Transformer architecture.